From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 02:23:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216C11065670 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:23:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao105.cox.net (eastrmmtao105.cox.net [68.230.240.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BD88FC0C for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:23:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090112022303.QMHU4139.eastrmmtao105.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net>; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:23:03 -0500 Received: from localhost ([68.103.37.153]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id 2SP41b00H3JFCbG02SP47A; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:23:04 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=-sk2TVsTu_0oLJC_zdMA:9 a=wAihJeELabUTUdOFBwcA:7 a=p97ZRQuZd5fXiEyZmaJOL2edBHUA:4 a=twX6zS2zVsUA:10 a=EjqEEEZFVOMA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:22:55 -0600 To: "Kevin Oberman" From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20090111235019.5751C1CC0B@ptavv.es.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20090111235019.5751C1CC0B@ptavv.es.net> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.63 (Linux) Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Issues with 2.24 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:23:06 -0000 On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:50:19 -0600, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:32:29 -0600 >> From: "Jeremy Messenger" >> >> On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:09:09 -0600, Kevin Oberman >> wrote: >> >> > I have upgraded two systems following the instructions in UPDATING and >> > have some issues. I'm not too sure of the significance, but I want ed >> > report them. >> > >> > One system is new (as of Dec. 20) with gnome2, gnome2-office, >> > gnome2-powertools and gnome2-fifth-toe installed from ports. >> > >> > First, when I ran 'pkgdb -Ff', I got: >> > Duplicated origin: x11-toolkits/gtk20 - gail-1.22.3 gtk-2.14.7 >> > Unregister any of them? [no] >> > >> > I had no idea which, if either to unregister. Similar message on >> > fast-user-switch-applet-2.22.0_3 and gdm. I did not unregister any of >> > them and proceeded to deinstall gtkmm and run the big portupgrade. >> >> Is your ports/MOVED up to date? The pkgdb is supposed to understand >> MOVED >> (not use pkgdb/portupgrade for very long time), right? >> >> > At the end of the upgrade, I got the following messages: >> > ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >> > * x11-toolkits/gtk20 (gail-1.22.3) >> > * x11/gdm (fast-user-switch-applet-2.22.0_3) >> > ! x11/gnome2 (gnome2-2.22.3_1) (install error) >> > >> > I ran pkgdb -Ff again and then I unregistered gail. Most (all?) gnome >> > ports had the dependency corrected. I think that this was not a >> problem, >> > but it was something I was unsure of. >> > >> > I then re-installed gnome2 and all appeared to be OK. I finally did >> > 'portupgrade gnome-session'. This was a no-op and gnome-session had >> > already been upgraded, so I did 'portupgrade -f gnome-session'. If >> this >> > was what was expected, I think UPDATING should be updated to reflect >> > this as well as the issue of the pkgdb run. >> >> I can add '-f' in UPDATING. Thanks for report! >> >> Cheers, >> Mezz >> >> > Neither system is local to me ATM, so I have not confirmed whether >> Gnome >> > 2.24 is working OK. I'll do that tomorrow. >> > >> > As always, thanks to the Gnome team for the great work! > > Yep. I have confirmed that those ports are in MOVED, but that was no > enough to deal with the merge. It works for renames and actual moves, > but merges seem beyond it's capability. I see... The portmaster has no issue with that. Cheers, Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org