Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 11:04:35 -0400 From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> To: "Dan O'Connor" <dan@mostgraveconcern.com> Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: atapci0 error with 4.0! Message-ID: <20000429110435.C29290@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> In-Reply-To: <060901bfb1a6$43d0ad20$0200000a@danco>; from dan@mostgraveconcern.com on Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 11:43:44PM -0700 References: <060901bfb1a6$43d0ad20$0200000a@danco>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 11:43:44PM -0700, Dan O'Connor wrote: > Oh, no! FBSD 4.0 doesn't like my Dell Dimension XPS 90MHz (Intel P166MHz O/D > CPU) motherboard... > > I'm in the process of upgrading 3.4-STABLE to 4.0-STABLE and after the 'make > buildworld' and kernel compile steps, I reboot the machine into single-user > mode, and poof--kenel panic: > > atapci0: <RZ 100? ATA controller !WARNING! buggy chip data loss > possible> port 0x3f4-0x3f7,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 1.0 on pci0 > atapci0: Busmastering DMA not supported > panic: resource_list_alloc: resource entry is busy > > This error occurs not only with my custom kernel, but with GENERIC as well. > This machine runs flawlessly with 3.4-STABLE (and 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 2.2.8, and > 2.2.7 before that), so I really doubt if the ATA controller chip is *that* > buggy. > > Just to check to see if it was just this machine, I tried booting the 4.0 > installation floppies on a similar machine (w/ 90MHZ CPU) and, presto, same > thing... > > I get the impression the new ATAPI driver isn't really ready for prime time > yet.... > > Is there anything I can do about this? It seems a shame to be stuck with 3.4 > for the rest of my life... > > The complete boot message is below... Here is something I was told, -----Begin Forwarded Message----- Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20000418233347.00964ce0@pop.uky.edu> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 23:41:03 -0400 To: cjclark@home.com From: Greg Childers <gchil0@pop.uky.edu> Subject: Re: RZ100 ATA Controller Problem - Possible Workaround?? In-Reply-To: <20000418215843.D55844@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> References: <D76D503DE976D1119C7E00A0C944D87501CA7F53@rsys002a.private.roke.co.uk> <D76D503DE976D1119C7E00A0C944D87501CA7F53@rsys002a.private.roke.co.uk> >I have this problem too. See my thread, "Problem Booting 4.0R Floppy >(ATA Driver?)." And note the date. The day after 4.0-RELEASE was >announced. :( > >3.4 was and is running again just fine on this machine (but it was a >pain to reinstall it). I built my own kernels with some different ata >options, but never got it to boot. Hell, I took off all IDE devices >and compiled the kernel without ATA support and it still died. > >Has anyone put in a PR on this? Now that it seems pretty definate that >it is the IDE controller, I will submit one if there isn't one >already. >-- >Crist J. Clark cjclark@home.com The ATA driver currently will not work with either the RZ100x or the CMD640. It panics. This is a known issue, but the maintainer considers it low priority since both of these chipsets are broken, could cause data loss, and shouldn't be used anyway. Perhaps you should pick up a Promise IDE controller for about $30. Greg -----End Forwarded Message----- Note that one thing I said was incorrect, if I build a kernel with no ATA support, it will boot... but a lot of good that does me. Although I could make the system all SCSI. An all SCSI P90... that would be neat, huh? -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@home.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000429110435.C29290>