From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 11 14:35:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55EF106564A; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFF88FC1B; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 63.imp.bsdimp.com (63.imp.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3BEUobj064552 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:32:24 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:32:24 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8ADBCF69-67AB-4E39-99D0-9971E942F1FA@bsdimp.com> References: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> <924400541.20110411125319@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard-Labb=E9?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:32:24 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does somebody work on NanoBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:28 -0000 On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:07 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labb=C3=A9 wrote: > 2011/4/11 Lev Serebryakov : >> Hello, Olivier. >> You wrote 11 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8F 2011 =D0=B3., = 11:51:09: >=20 >> (1) Copied out "upgrade" image has always ${NANO_LABEL}s1 label, and >> needs manual mdconfig+tunefs before dumping on second code partition >>=20 >> (2) updatep2 script uses sed 's/${NANO_DRIVE}s1/${NANO_DRIVE}s2/' >> script, and if NANO_LABLE is in use (which sets NANO_DRIVE to >> "ufs/labels1") sed complains. >>=20 >=20 > OK, I didn't see this problem because I'm using my own upgrade script > (I've merged update1 and update2 in one script): > = http://bsdrp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bsdrp/trunk/Files/usr/local/sbin/u= pgrade I also think that FreeNAS has its own script, which I though had been = merged to head. Warner