From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 5 07:17:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCD21065686 for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 07:17:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jos@catnook.com) Received: from lizzy.dyndns.org (209-204-188-132.dsl.static.sonic.net [209.204.188.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 985358FC16 for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 07:17:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jos@catnook.com) Received: (qmail 64330 invoked by uid 1000); 5 Oct 2008 07:18:07 -0000 Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 00:18:07 -0700 From: Jos Backus To: Tim Kientzle Message-ID: <20081005071807.GA54013@lizzy.catnook.local> References: <20081004080511.GA72641@lizzy.catnook.local> <20081004161024.GA67323@nagual.pp.ru> <20081004222249.GA48928@lizzy.catnook.local> <48E80F02.4070309@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48E80F02.4070309@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: Andrey Chernov , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firefox3-bin crashes near arc4random_buf() X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jos@catnook.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 07:17:47 -0000 On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 05:49:06PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Jos Backus wrote: > > Any suggestions on how to debug this? > > First, you need to share the first items in the > backtrace, as they're more likely to be correct. > I agree with Andrey that it looks like there's > some stack corruption, so it's hard to trust > anything except the first couple of entries. Okay, I'll do that tomorrow. > You should also look at several independent core > dumps and see how much the backtraces have in common. So far the bottom-most frames have looked the same every time. I'll do some more thorough comparisons and report the results. > It might also be worth running it under ktrace, > forcing the crash, then sharing the last few dozen > lines from kdump output. I'll try that, too. Thank you, Andrey and Tim, for your help so far. -- Jos Backus jos at catnook.com