From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sat Jan 26 05:00:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B1A14B122F for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 05:00:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from raven.bwct.de (raven.bwct.de [195.149.99.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "raven.bwct.de", Issuer "raven.bwct.de" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 835AF8DC74 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 05:00:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from mail.cicely.de ([10.1.1.37]) by raven.bwct.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x0Q50msB089215 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 26 Jan 2019 06:00:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cicely.de; s=default; t=1548478850; bh=7HDOndkKKJPIIs8yaNrFEHgrHiYy0FwUBD77fblYnuk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To; b=BvbxQthBhFcuPWulZwZ3NnvzbAz7DF6mDj+h2GwX6BifB0kjwIMjd979wOOsjIyNu DECTP8RM0b7Na1MzvleST2pk/JV7G+twnYCQxI/xqdJ/VKzflJ208EVg/kWyTbP3P4 C69oWkY+C//hLXzJDliSLdnFgx8KkYrm9fEsh3ec= Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (cicely7.cicely.de [10.1.1.9]) by mail.cicely.de (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x0Q50604072508 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 26 Jan 2019 06:00:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely7.cicely.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x0Q51LPx081843; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 06:01:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely7.cicely.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x0Q51KbC081842; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 06:01:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 06:01:20 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Warner Losh Cc: ticso@cicely.de, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, Bernd Walter Subject: Re: 12-RELEASE loader fails on Orange Pi R1 (maybe 256MB related) Message-ID: <20190126050119.GJ74542@cicely7.cicely.de> Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de References: <20190126030330.GI74542@cicely7.cicely.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely7.cicely.de 12.0-STABLE amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on spamd.cicely.de X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 835AF8DC74 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=cicely.de header.s=default header.b=BvbxQthB X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.92 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[ticso@cicely.de]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cicely.de:s=default]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.985,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cicely.de]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cicely.de:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx1.bwct.de]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.99.149.195.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.20.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.17)[-0.169,0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.959,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:21461, ipnet:195.149.99.0/24, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.00)[country: DE(-0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 05:00:55 -0000 On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 09:36:44PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019, 9:08 PM Bernd Walter > > > It might be because my R1 is a 256MB, while the tested zero is 512MB. > > I can test a 256MB zero in a few days, but don't have a 256MB zero at home. > > > > Maybe it is the block cache code? It hovers up a ton of memory.... it was > fixed on i386, though, I thought... Ok, then I will pick up a 256MB Orange Pi zero tomorrow and test with it. -- B.Walter http://www.bwct.de Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.