From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 26 14:59:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A4B16A4CE for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:59:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41305.mail.yahoo.com (web41305.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A498F43D1F for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:59:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alohaguy123@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040226225916.39208.qmail@web41305.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [208.201.244.226] by web41305.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:59:16 PST Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:59:16 -0800 (PST) From: Aloha Guy To: Charles Swiger In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: FreeBSD box as router adding latency X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 22:59:16 -0000 Charles Swiger wrote: On Feb 26, 2004, at 4:53 PM, Aloha Guy wrote: > Here is the HZ setting: > > kern.clockrate: { hz = 100, tick = 10000, profhz = 1024, stathz = 128 } There's your issue right there: if you care about the millisecond level granularity of network traffic going by this router, you ought to set HZ to 1000 as documented in "man dummynet". -- -Chuck Knew I forgot to read something. I guess I forgot all about dummynet is the one doing the traffic shaping as I never used traffic shaping on the other boxes when they were used as both Ethernet and T1 routers. I've always had NMBCLUSERS set to 32768 which I assume is fine. Also, is there a way to use two NICs like a xl0 and a fxp0 and bond them together with just one IP? John --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail