From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 23:50:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305C616A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:50:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from mail.mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF04843D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:50:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A069F20C6; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:50:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.mcneil.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45888-02; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865E0F18CC; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:50:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean McNeil To: Martin Cracauer In-Reply-To: <20050728193519.A66123@cons.org> References: <3.0.1.32.20050728013152.00a4d188@pop.redshift.com> <20050728193519.A66123@cons.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Sean McNeil Consulting, Inc Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:50:48 -0700 Message-Id: <1122594648.45827.11.camel@server.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mcneil.com Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Benchmarks: AMD64 vs i386 on Dual 246 Opteron X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: sean@mcneil.com List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:50:58 -0000 On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 19:35 -0400, Martin Cracauer wrote: > I highly suspect that the 64 bit version of FreeBSD in this > comparision was somehow doomed before it started. Opportunities are > leaving in kernel safety code in one of the kernels, a driver that > just doesn't work right on AMD64. Or the same for any of the > software, maybe php is hosed in its 64 bit build. If network throughput can effect the testing, I would suspect network drivers. I've found the re0 driver performs horrible on amd64. Especially with gigE. Cheers, Sean