From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 19 08:57:19 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA22277 for current-outgoing; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 08:57:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.159]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA22262; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 08:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Aug95-0530PM) id AA19493; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 11:56:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 11:56:58 -0400 From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <9606191556.AA19493@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Nate Williams , Poul-Henning Kamp , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tcl -- what's going on here. In-Reply-To: <22601.835171642@time.cdrom.com> References: <199606190523.XAA04861@rocky.sri.MT.net> <22601.835171642@time.cdrom.com> Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk < said: > Now I've also had the benefit of having Poul talk to me about this for > a couple of days beforehand, so I know his intentions were purer than > you suspect - I don't expect you to have the benefit of the additional > context, so I'm trying to explain here. It would have been nice if he had talked to me, too... and perhaps about five or ten other people who he knew would probably have opinions on the subject. > future someday but have steadily tried to avoid. We knew it was in > our future because the prospect of re-bmaking every port we ever > wanted to ugrade, now and in the future, has traditionally _sucked_ > and we've hated it from day one. Speak for yourself. I've never had any difficulty in writing a Berkeley-style makefile. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant