From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 19 01:42:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5472137B401 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 01:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhub02.unibe.ch (mailhub02.unibe.ch [130.92.9.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684CA43F93 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 01:42:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roth@iam.unibe.ch) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub02.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAEF764AC; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 10:42:21 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mailhub02.unibe.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailhub02 [127.0.0.1:10024]) (amavisd-new) with LMTP id 14666-01-34; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 10:42:20 +0200 (MEST) Received: from asterix.unibe.ch (asterix.unibe.ch [130.92.64.4]) by mailhub02.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4AE764A8; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 10:42:20 +0200 (MEST) Received: from speedy.unibe.ch (speedy [130.92.64.35]) by asterix.unibe.ch (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6J8gGK26931; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 10:42:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from roth@localhost) by speedy.unibe.ch (8.11.6+Sun/8.10.2) id h6J8gFT02512; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 10:42:15 +0200 (MEST) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 10:42:14 +0200 From: Tobias Roth To: Rus Foster Message-ID: <20030719084214.GA2469@speedy.unibe.ch> References: <20030718232702.Y2947@thor.65535.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030718232702.Y2947@thor.65535.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: SunOS speedy 5.8 Generic_108528-16 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80 X-Virus-checked: by University of Berne cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UNIONFS Stability X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:42:23 -0000 On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 11:30:15PM -0700, Rus Foster wrote: > Hi All, > How stable is unionfs? Reading the man page for mount_unionfs its says > that its not. Is that still true or is it better on 5.x? ATM I'm running > 4.8 mount -o union is very stable for me. note that this is not quite the same as mount_unionfs. i am using it on 5.1.