Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 6 May 2003 09:45:34 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>, Ben Mesander <ben@timing.com>, Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>, "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: `Hiding' libc symbols
Message-ID:  <20030506164534.GB36798@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030506155128.GB77956@madman.celabo.org>
References:  <20030505225021.GA43345@nagual.pp.ru> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10305051855570.10283-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> <16055.55244.458061.779430@piglet.timing.com> <20030506155128.GB77956@madman.celabo.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 10:51:28AM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 09:42:04AM -0600, Ben Mesander wrote:
> > In addition to ports which override libc functions like printf() for
> > ease of porting, there are important ports, such as the Boehm garbage
> > collector for C/C++ or electric fence, which _depend_ upon the ability
> > to override libc functions such as malloc() and free().
> > 
> > Whatever decision is eventually made must allow such ports to
> > function.
> > 
> > This has been brought up once before, but I do not see how any of the
> > advocates for change have addressed it.
> 
> Probably because there is not much to address.  I think it is
> universally agreed that the allocator is likely to need to be
> overridden.  There are at least two solutions:
> 
>   (a) Treat malloc & company as an exception: always call them by
>       their un-adorned name from within libc.
> 
>   (b) Let these specialized applications override the adorned names
>       instead.  There is probably already code within these ports to
>       deal with underscore-prefixed names.
> 
> I don't really have a preference for either solution.

I have a strong preference for (c) Do nothing.
(a)'s over time we'll just add to (a)'s list, so the exceptions are just
too ad-hoc.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030506164534.GB36798>