From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 25 11:01:13 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12A9106564A
	for <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:01:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from snabb@epipe.com)
Received: from tiktik.epipe.com (tiktik.epipe.com [IPv6:2001:1828:0:3::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6624D8FC18
	for <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:01:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from tiktik.epipe.com (tiktik.epipe.com [IPv6:2001:1828:0:3::2])
	by tiktik.epipe.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0PB1CVv080679
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:01:12 GMT (envelope-from snabb@epipe.com)
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 tiktik.epipe.com p0PB1CVv080679
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=epipe.com; s=default;
	t=1295953272; x=1296558072;
	bh=Pgw5UgCwm7rnmtN1ucIlz9xNk+6nXI5zmYzplRgVLnE=;
	h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:
	MIME-Version:Content-Type;
	b=IWRMptA0jq0QJVm4uxwDwBqBu20gedBFbHZAyzxz7KGmUhBi8yabvqR0RDBaJBM9L
	3w0CdeG2NmcD/QHK/xI42duDvpKZFk0kqrI+hyZS/SmOadhOsQUUcKe9NunjDDd0mY
	AFaR1PHenGYO08u5CdPcDvZBqQYrIY42zVSQrDIc=
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:01:12 +0000 (UTC)
From: Janne Snabb <snabb@epipe.com>
To: "karim.allah.ahmed@gmail.com" <karim.allah.ahmed@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinxWsj9r93AUwYqCmhfw9dGCfsCUPZRh50314Js@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101251058060.20212@tiktik.epipe.com>
References: <AANLkTinxWsj9r93AUwYqCmhfw9dGCfsCUPZRh50314Js@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6
	(tiktik.epipe.com [IPv6:2001:1828:0:3::2]);
	Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:01:12 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Issue with non-PAE enable i386 xen guest
X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage
	<freebsd-xen.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen>,
	<mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen>,
	<mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:01:13 -0000

On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, karim.allah.ahmed@gmail.com wrote:

> Is the current non-PAE xen guest implementation broke intentionally, or is
> this a merge issue or something ?

According to http://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/Xen it is not supposed
to work:

"Para-virtualized i386 kernels require options PAE to be included
in the kernel configuration."

--
Janne Snabb / EPIPE Communications
snabb@epipe.com - http://epipe.com/