From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jun 24 9:51:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from wondermutt.net (host75-157.student.udel.edu [128.175.75.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E1037B5EA for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2000 09:51:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from papalia@udel.edu) Received: from morgaine.udel.edu (morgaine.wondermutt.net [192.168.1.2]) by wondermutt.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA11985 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2000 12:51:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from papalia@udel.edu) Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20000624124335.00abf550@mail.udel.edu> X-Sender: papalia@mail.udel.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 12:48:39 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: John Subject: Kerberos IV or 5 ? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all, I was looking at configuring kerberos to run on my mail server so I started poking around. The first task was (is) to figure out if it was/is installed at buildworld. I'm guessing no, is this correct? Looking in /etc/make.conf, I see a line: #MAKE_KERBEROS4= yes Followed by an indication that there's also a version 5. So, reading up at the MIT web site, it seems that there is now version 5, which appears to also be in the ports tree. I guess my question is: which is "better", "correct", or "currently most supported"? Uncommenting that line in make.conf and including version 4, or installing the port for version 5? Thanks in advance, John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message