From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec  7 18:55:43 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92013540
 for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Sun,  7 Dec 2014 18:55:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from etive.allicient.co.uk (etive.allicient.co.uk [207.158.37.19])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C94A623
 for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Sun,  7 Dec 2014 18:55:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 52971 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2014 18:49:01 -0000
Received: from mail-vc0-f181.google.com (allicientsmtpauth@[209.85.220.181])
 (envelope-sender <peter@allicient.co.uk>)
 by etive.allicient.co.uk (qmail-ldap-1.03) with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP
 for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; 7 Dec 2014 18:49:01 -0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id le20so1593957vcb.40
 for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 10:48:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.220.106.78 with SMTP id w14mr22013646vco.46.1417978139687;
 Sun, 07 Dec 2014 10:48:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.59.202 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 10:48:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <473461417967573@web11h.yandex.ru>
References: <363021417833295@web21g.yandex.ru>
 <20141207111233.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu>
 <473461417967573@web11h.yandex.ru>
From: Peter Maxwell <peter@allicient.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 18:48:29 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+aY-u6N26QWMCV4vHiprno_wF3rzSgj8LY3jtHoyLKUzmBsgA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why merging recent OpenBSD PF code is not easy (was Re: FOLLOW-UP)
To: "freebsd-pf@freebsd.org" <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter
 \(pf\)" <freebsd-pf.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-pf>,
 <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
 <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 18:55:43 -0000

On 7 December 2014 at 15:52, Martin Hanson <greencoppermine@yandex.com>
wrote:
>
>
> Did anyone on FreeBSD bother to look at that first?
>
> Multi-threading!?
>
> So okay, now there's essentially another product on FreeBSD, its NOT PF any
> longer! It's "old crap that should have been updated some six years ago"
> with
> new multi-threading support! And then some fixes here and there by a single
> guy, or two guys.
>
> Bad decisions don't become right just because you sugar coat them with some
> new flavor.
>
> All we need now is a new name, how about fpf (f***ed, PF?). Sorry.
>


Given you appear to believe you are well acquainted with the problem, why
not pull your finger out of your proverbial and sort it yourself?