From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 19:14:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDB316A407 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:14:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com) Received: from web30312.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30312.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.69.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C356713C44B for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:14:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 58053 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Jan 2007 19:14:32 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=pUYO7ukm8bbMoIFfSuFPQp3eKc2pZwl7nR87vSQJQPkr2g3b3puT70zPg/SXowBZC22FQg4+2uR6zD1hSbwcfBuEX8XbAIlJntVroA49CicExrdCHk5CYozBvdoWQY+xf0Ta0jpBJJAKcgaatPjbEhnxRAzhrnSkmM/8XwRDpso=; X-YMail-OSG: MDZ4xpIVM1nO3p70LiA4YjmVeOiQ8R8SPlckFzLLFcoTrqcyUB1HhfvsYRxaX7iGS1htCOp4JaloDMNXGYQE7WmkI_0Ivb1.mD._tGq4r5LKArPM77_Bzy3Ww7W7agxqvK.48_33HLLnNYw- Received: from [213.54.176.27] by web30312.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:14:31 PST Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:14:31 -0800 (PST) From: "R. B. Riddick" To: CyberLeo Kitsana In-Reply-To: <45A9293B.2070607@cyberleo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <157957.58037.qm@web30312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: FreeBSD Geom Subject: Re: geom_raid5 livelock? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:14:33 -0000 --- CyberLeo Kitsana wrote: > R. B. Riddick wrote: > > and after line 1160 (the line with = EIO;) > > G_RAID5_LOGREQ(bp, "[not-equal]"); > > Does this addition go within the 'if' block or below it? > Just below the 'if block'... > I am certain that the verify ran to completion because, while initially > assembling the RAID, I distinctly remember complaining about how long it > took to verify 1.2 terabytes. I also emulated a disk failure during > later testing, to verify that the array was rebuilt correctly afterwards. > Hmm... And after that "emulated disk failure"? :-) Did u run the verify again? > It is unlikely the wdt setting will have much effect, as the data gets > dumped all at once anyways, and all filesystems are sync'ed immediately > afterwards. Thanks for the suggestion, though. > OK... -Arne ____________________________________________________________________________________ Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index