From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 17 13:25:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E5316A4CE for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 13:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7541D43D31 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 13:25:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BEwN2-0004SG-00 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 22:25:00 +0200 Received: from 213-203-244-156.kunde.vdserver.de ([213.203.244.156]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 22:25:00 +0200 Received: from kai by 213-203-244-156.kunde.vdserver.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 22:25:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Kai Grossjohann Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 22:25:04 +0200 Lines: 12 Message-ID: <87k70eqrmn.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> References: <200404151110.i3FBAaoo048373@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> <200404161720.37041.dgw@liwest.at> <20040416151302.218d58fb.miles@lubin.us> <200404162234.05133.dgw@liwest.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213-203-244-156.kunde.vdserver.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:fScpwAUU9Ustg5UuCKpyGHU8bT0= Sender: news Subject: Re: Beginning C++ in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 20:25:02 -0000 Daniela writes: > Why would one need C++ if it's converted to C anyway? Why would one need C if it's converted to machine language anyway? Why would one need machine language if it's converted to micro-ops anyway? Do you see my point? Kai