From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 06:30:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3169D16A4CE for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 06:30:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D071943D2D for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 06:30:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7C6S2x8001518 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:28:02 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:28:13 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20040812.002813.115746732.imp@bsdimp.com> To: current@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <200408110916.i7B9GTj43770@Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK> References: <20040811065912.GA95263@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040811080350.GK80234@ip.net.ua> <200408110916.i7B9GTj43770@Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: World broken in stage 1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 06:30:05 -0000 In message: <200408110916.i7B9GTj43770@Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK> Barry Bouwsma writes: : Which brings up something else -- has there been any : resolution of the conflict between `DISTDIR' as used by : ports, and `DISTDIR' as used by the `distribute' targets? : I have the former set in my make.conf, which resulted in : some odd paths, no matter how I specified `DESTDIR=' and : `DISTDIR=' as both environment and `make' options when in : the top-level src directory, but resolved itself only when : given as an option within the `etc' subdirectory. No. At work we do unnatural things to make ports honor DESTDIR in the way that we think it should work (build in a chroot, install into a chroot, make the package, and then chroot to DESTDIR and install there again). Warner