Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 15:52:54 +0300 From: "Andrew A. Chernov, Black Mage" <ache@astral.msk.su> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, Ollivier ROBERT <roberto@blaise.ibp.fr> Cc: burg@burg.is.ge.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bidirectional ports ? Message-ID: <mScQN-k41K@astral.msk.su> In-Reply-To: <9412221127.AA02151@blaise.ibp.fr>; from Ollivier ROBERT at Thu, 22 Dec 1994 12:27:53 %2B0100 (MET) References: <9412221127.AA02151@blaise.ibp.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <9412221127.AA02151@blaise.ibp.fr> Ollivier ROBERT writes: >> Another bug: if I run cu while rlogin'ed, it connects correctly, but >> when I type "~.", both cu and rlogin exit. >AFAIK it is not a bug but a feature of the rlogin protocol :-) >The problem is that both cu and rlogin use the same escape mechanism... >When I know that I'll use cu, I do a telnet first :-) you can change ~ inside cu, but I am not shure that it works. Something like ~s escape <new_char> -- Andrew A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?mScQN-k41K>