From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Nov 11 18:53:20 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA11246 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 18:53:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat0574.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.190.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA11240 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 18:53:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA28259; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 22:52:45 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 22:52:44 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker To: Mike Smith cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: StarOffice-5.0... In-Reply-To: <199811120236.SAA06936@dingo.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Moved to -chat On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Mike Smith wrote: > I have to ask - why do you care? I can think of much better things to > do with my time than stare at the list of IRQ's in use - what do they > expect them to do? A little song and dance number perhaps? Well, in the case of the IRQs, I don't much care...but its one of those "does it harm anything to *have* that information in /proc"? > (If you need the information, try 'systat -vmstat'.) Cool, never knew about that one, thanks :) I learn a new thing each and every time I get into these conversations :( Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message