From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Mar 23 6:30:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from wop21.wop.wtb.tue.nl (wop21.wop.wtb.tue.nl [131.155.56.216]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF6A37B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 06:30:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from karelj@wop21.wop.wtb.tue.nl) Received: (from karelj@localhost) by wop21.wop.wtb.tue.nl (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2NET6G32711; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 15:29:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from karelj) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 15:29:06 +0100 From: "Karel J. Bosschaart" To: Andrew Hesford Cc: Nader Turki , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linprocfs Message-ID: <20010323152905.A32686@wop21.wop.wtb.tue.nl> References: <20010322182700.A28850@wop21.wop.wtb.tue.nl> <20010322170140.B9880@cec.wustl.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20010322170140.B9880@cec.wustl.edu>; from ajh3@chmod.ath.cx on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 05:01:40PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 05:01:40PM -0600, Andrew Hesford wrote: > Doesn't linprocfs have to be in the kernel, for instance with the line: > > options LINPROCFS > > I'm just guessing, I've never used the linux proc fs. > I'm using the linprocfs.ko kernel module, so it doesn't necessarily need to be compiled in the kernel. AFAIK it's loaded automatically when mounting linprocfs. Be aware when you have an older version of FreeBSD - linprocfs was for a while only supported by an unofficial port (it was during 4.0-STABLE). Karel. -- NOTE: From Friday 23rd March, 17:00 to Sunday 25th this email address might be unreachable due to network rearrangements. You might want to use freebsdfan@zonnet.nl or freebsdfan@yahoo.com instead. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message