From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 12 10:18:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2981F9E6; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:18:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@daemonic.se) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48521DA9; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:18:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C6040043; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:18:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id DDAAC4004E; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:18:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 Received: from mx.daemonic.se (mx.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACDBC40043; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:18:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ZnFRt1vBlz8ggx; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:18:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mx.daemonic.se ([10.1.0.3]) (using TLS with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA) by mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [10.1.0.6]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTPS id AHJrwtnQloXJ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:18:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [10.1.0.4]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ZnFRr27kWz8ggv; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:18:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (celes.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1::3]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3ZnFRr1bVKz9Ctj; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:18:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5167DF62.8090903@daemonic.se> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:18:10 +0200 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Isabell Long Subject: Re: RFC: Changing the documentation's font style. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130411-1, 2013-04-11), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:18:21 -0000 On 2013-04-12 11:41, Isabell Long wrote: > Hi all, > > I sent this idea to the #bsddocs IRC channel a few days ago and no-one > there objected, but here you go. I'd like to know your opinions on the > documentation font being changed from serif to sans-serif. This would > only affect the web-based docs, not the ones being prepared for print. Looks nice to me. I still believe it's better with a serif font for print though. Is it possible to get different types of fonts for different distributions of the handbook, for instance, the PDF can have a serif font, but the web pages a sans-serif font, or something like that. Just a curious question. Regards! -- Niclas