From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:46:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66FCC16A509 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:46:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243D043D72 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:46:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-95-215.51-151.net24.it [151.51.215.95]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4CFnQkS088287 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:49:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4CFjXtQ090686; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:45:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4464ADA6.8080000@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:45:42 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44649FA9.6080700@netfence.it> <20060512105823.0ff46f01.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20060512105823.0ff46f01.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Subject: Re: fsck way too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:46:11 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: >> First of all: I believe that fsck should run in background, but it >> doesn't. How can I tell why? > >>From my desktop: > mount > /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local) > devfs on /dev (devfs, local) > > Note that / does not have soft-updates, which I believe is the default. > AFAIR, fsck can not do background mode unless soft-updates is enabled. > > That's likely your problem. > I have turned them on: /dev/da0s1a on / (ufs, local, soft-updates) As other pointed out, however, / won't be checked in background. This is still ok, for me, given it would take <5 min, as it should and as it did in the past. bye & Thanks av.