Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 07:42:27 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG> To: David Scheidt <dscheidt@enteract.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: a two-level port system? (fwd) Message-ID: <19990601074227.B58405@bitbox.follo.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96.990601002026.6035B-100000@shell-3.enteract.com>; from David Scheidt on Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 12:28:11AM -0500 References: <19990601071242.A58405@bitbox.follo.net> <Pine.NEB.3.96.990601002026.6035B-100000@shell-3.enteract.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 12:28:11AM -0500, David Scheidt wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > > (3) Hit jkh with a baseball bat until he stops refusing to use soft > > updates on the boot floppy during install (due to "making a point") > > What exactly is the point? We clearly wouldn't be distributing a > kernel withoutthe whole sources, so I wouldn't think we would be > violating the license. The point that FreeBSD won't willingly be using restricted source code as a part of our distribution mechanism, I think. It seems to be within the license, and anyway I believe that Kirk would be willing to grant us an exception for using it on the boot floppy if it wasn't. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990601074227.B58405>