From owner-freebsd-net Mon Oct 25 8:55:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from horst.bfd.com (horst.bfd.com [12.9.219.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5CC151DB; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 08:55:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ejs@bfd.com) Received: from HARLIE.bfd.com (bastion.bfd.com [12.9.219.14]) by horst.bfd.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA14375; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 08:54:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ejs@bfd.com) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 08:54:07 -0700 (PDT) From: "Eric J. Schwertfeger" To: Tony Jago Cc: Julian Elischer , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Very Poor Samba -> Win9x performance [more] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Tony Jago wrote: > Just incase I was doing something insane, I installed a brand new > 3.3-RELEASE machine running the GENERIC kernel, installed samba from the > ports and did a smbclient "put" - still very slow performance. This is > very repeatable, I have tryed this on 3 different hardware platforms on > different networks and different network cards, they all do exactly the > same thing. > > Tweeking with the samba config file makes no difference, this must be > something way beyond that. We are talking 9k a second, not much more then > a modem out of 100M ethernet cards on switched networks! These machine > can ftp at rates closer to 5 megabytes a second and above. Someone stated that the Samba port had patches to fix the speed problem seen with FreeBSD (it's not just 3.3, it's 2.0.5a and any recent FreeBSD, AFAIK). What they failed to mention is that the Samba port was updated after 3.3-RELEASE, and it looks like said patches are part of the post-3.3R update. So try downloading the latest port, and installing from that. I'll be doing the same today. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message