From owner-freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org Wed May 5 14:06:02 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gecko@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A510263FE15 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 14:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FZz5Q458yz3tNP for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 14:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8AA3963FC2C; Wed, 5 May 2021 14:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: gecko@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A69463FC2B for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 14:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZz5Q3RDSz3tWM for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 14:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65D17261C0 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 14:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 145E62i5020231 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 14:06:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 145E62Sq020230 for gecko@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 5 May 2021 14:06:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255359] www/firefox: Fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update: LLVM ERROR: Broken module found Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 14:06:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: evgeniy@khramtsov.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gecko@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 14:06:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255359 --- Comment #10 from Evgeniy Khramtsov --- (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #9) I don't feel like hijacking the topic of this bug for discussion of x11@ policy, but I think I should clarify: > if mesa can compile Upstream accepts LLVM versions >=3D 8.0.0 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/blob/mesa-20.2.3/meson.build#L14= 49-1455 For example, Arch Linux already builds against LLVM 11 (see llvm-libs versi= on): https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/mesa/ The current LLVM 10 for mesa-libs is outdated. > Note that it says "=3D" not "?=3D" which must be for a reason. :) x11@ favors apparent stability and the use of binary packages. They also think that putting artificial limitations like non-overridable LL= VM version for people who build from source is a good idea, maybe because hand= ling possible reports is too hard. Not to mention the time and carbon footprint = of the hardcoded LLVM version. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=