Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:23:16 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ports/116448: devel/dbus intolerent of existing 556 GID Message-ID: <1190208196.33961.22.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <20070919132046.GA74778@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200709182152.l8ILq9wH089174@freefall.freebsd.org> <20070919005410.GA57936@dragon.NUXI.org> <1190174125.85751.51.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20070919132046.GA74778@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-L7yUoBngbyPJ4iJOqgX1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
David O'Brien p=ED=B9e v st 19. 09. 2007 v 06:20 -0700:
> I'm curious - why doesn't dbus then just use 'pw' to create the group
> with an unspecified GID like the svn port does? Why was this so
> anonying? I was trying to build evolution-exchange before going to work
> - and of course the build broke 1/2 thru. Which I didn't notice until I
> got home.
Because it's kinda hard to distribute binary packages, if the UID/GIDs
on files the package extracts is unpredictable.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Knight: We shall say Ny! again to you if you do not appease us.
Arthur: All right. What do you want?
Knight: We want... a shruberry!
--=-L7yUoBngbyPJ4iJOqgX1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBG8SLAntdYP8FOsoIRAnwfAKDBF2xA2BFl574Ao220iMwKpCxs+wCeIJTT
QqLyNfJhmDs4U9P8Nk7p64E=
=a0FL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-L7yUoBngbyPJ4iJOqgX1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1190208196.33961.22.camel>