Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:57:08 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA does not work on zfs (with test case) Message-ID: <4F7C0CE4.2030408@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F7C0B41.20702@fsn.hu> References: <4F7BFDD4.6080703@fsn.hu> <4F7C088D.4070803@FreeBSD.org> <4F7C0B41.20702@fsn.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 04/04/2012 11:50 Attila Nagy said the following: > On 04/04/12 10:38, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 04/04/2012 10:52 Attila Nagy said the following: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've started to experiment with SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA in python on a recent >>> FreeBSD 9-STABLE/amd64 box and it quickly became evident that the program that >>> works on Solaris doesn't work on FreeBSD. >>> Python itself couldn't cause this, because it correctly issues the lseek, but >>> taking the C test program from here: >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/22/79 >>> gives the same result (failure). >> Please see this PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/164445 >> If you can't figure out a patch from its contents, then I'll try to provide it >> some time later today. >> > I will try it, but the e-mail above the patch is somewhat scary... Sorry, I could not understand what you mean. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F7C0CE4.2030408>