From owner-freebsd-java Mon Apr 15 4:39:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1559637B400 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 04:39:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 13:39:43 +0200 Message-ID: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FDA5F0@l04.research.kpn.com> From: "Koster, K.J." To: 'David Preece' Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Native as a binary - I thought we had this sussed now. Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 13:39:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear David, > > As per the subject, I thought there was an announcement > roundabout new years' > about Sun and the FreeBSD foundation finding some middle > ground and managing > to arrange a binary licence for a native JDK. Yet here I am > on 4.5 watching > the port building. Not wishing to be pissy, but what happened > about this? > The port is being worked on. Do a search on the mailing list archives. Greg Lewis posted a status report a bit back. Basically he asks us to do what we're doing: wait. There is no proper way for us to help. Sun prohibits anyone but Greg to work on this. > > Oh, and have there been any performance tests done of native 1.3.1 vs > IBM1.3.1 on linux emulation (assuming 4.5-R)? I have some > people wanting to > stick their Java app on FreeBSD, with me admin'ing the whole > thing and I'm > trying to work out what I've let myself in for. Put it this > way: They're software developers and they *admit* to it being > CPU intensive... > If you just want to run a JDK it need not be native. Try the Linux JDKs or the native port. Hotspot is not available at this time, but if you'll search the mailing list for a status report by Bill Huey, you'll see that it's not too far off either. I do all my development with linux-jdk1.3.1 and while it's not burning rubber it is performing adequately. Any bad performance problems we have stem from us writing bad SQL. The various JITs seem to work with JDK 1.3.1p6. Please experiment which one gives you the most performance increase for your particular application. Each JIT has its strenghts and weaknesses. If you have any problems running a JIT with 1.3.1p6 please post your findings on this list and I'm sure people will jump in to help you out. As they say on delayed airplanes: we thank you for your patience. Kees Jan ===================================================== You can't have everything. Where would you put it? [Steven Wright] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message