From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 7 04:59:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF96816A4CE for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 04:59:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE25D43D6B for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 04:59:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j174xDkc009035; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 20:59:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j174xBmR009032; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 20:59:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 20:59:11 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Mauro Message-ID: <20050207045911.GA8619@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <1106542417.29481.168.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41F4ADC1.8070201@freebsd.org> <42017276.1010304@finnovative.net> <4201C54A.8090009@freebsd.org> <1107418085.4125.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050206002904.GJ9350@dragon.nuxi.com> <1107656286.4131.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1107656286.4131.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: airport estreme with Freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 04:59:19 -0000 On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 07:18:06PM -0700, Mauro wrote: > On Sat, 2005-05-02 at 16:29 -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 01:08:04AM -0700, Mauro wrote: > > > I don't buy the theory about government frequencies. This theory asks > > > one to believe that government frequencies are not intercepted or > > > tampered with in some fashion. They are tampered with and can be done > > > so easily. Legally sold scanners enable one to listen in to all sorts > > > of private signals. > > > > One, don't top post -- it looses context. This isn't a Mickysoft list. > > > > Two isssue isn't necessarily about receiving certain frequencies as you > > assume. As Peter said one of the issues is the FCC doesn't want you to > > set the TRANSMITTING POWER above a certain power. > > To clarify my statement concerning ethnocentrism, > don't assume we're all american and that the FCC dictates to > non-americans their ideas concerning radio waves. So on a global level, > the excuse that the FCC doesn't approve doesn't wash. It sure does then the company in question is a USA company. They certainly *ARE* under the FCC's regulatory jurisdiction. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)