From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul 30 00:46:01 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E4916A41F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:46:01 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net
	[69.17.117.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F86243D45
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:46:01 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: (qmail 21578 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2005 00:46:00 -0000
Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org)
	([66.92.78.145])
	(envelope-sender <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>)
	by mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <glenn@antimatter.net>; 30 Jul 2005 00:46:00 -0000
Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147)
	id 664A03F; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:45:59 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org
To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com>
References: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNAEBHFCAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
Date: 29 Jul 2005 20:45:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNAEBHFCAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>
Message-ID: <44br4l5dfc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
Lines: 7
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:34:41 +0000
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Glenn Dawson <glenn@antimatter.net>,
	BlackBsd@Mountain.net
Subject: Re: Is Kern/Pr 58045 really fixed?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:46:01 -0000

"Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> writes:

> One reason bugs get closed is that the submitters don't respond
> to requests from the developers for further info.  A status of
> closed should not be interpreted to mean any bug was corrected.

In this case, it *does* mean that the patch from the PR was committed.