From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 18 11:01:29 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C4316A41B; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gemini@geminix.org) Received: from geminix.org (geminix.org [213.73.82.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BAD13C461; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gemini@geminix.org) Message-ID: <47401B78.4010007@geminix.org> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:01:12 +0100 From: Uwe Doering Organization: Private UNIX Site User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071106 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kmacy@FreeBSD.org References: <200711180823.lAI8NPUx057318@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200711180823.lAI8NPUx057318@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: from gemini by geminix.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ithtp-000GoO-EA; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:01:13 +0100 Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/32659: [vm] [patch] vm and vnode leak with vm.swap_idle_enabled=1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:01:29 -0000 kmacy@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: [vm] [patch] vm and vnode leak with vm.swap_idle_enabled=1 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: kmacy > State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 18 08:23:02 UTC 2007 > State-Changed-Why: > > Is this still an issue on RELENG_6 or RELENG_7? We don't use anything newer than RELENG_4, yet. However, a modified patch went into RELENG_4 (rev. 1.94.2.3). In my eyes it wasn't 100% semantically correct, but it did its job. The respective source code has changed quite a bit in RELENG_7 (probably RELENG_5 and RELENG_6, too, but I didn't look), mainly because of the introduction of kernel threads, and as far as I can tell from looking at the code the problem doesn't exist there. But I haven't tested it. Regards, Uwe -- Uwe Doering | EscapeBox - Managed On-Demand UNIX Servers gemini@geminix.org | http://www.escapebox.net