Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:42:58 -0400 From: Rick Miller <vrwmiller@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: security/openssh-portable: how to best test GSSAPI? Message-ID: <CAHzLAVGgdLtTG4z3vQ5%2BgrE2y6iPRTPnZSn-SZi_k2A1vq-jaw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAHzLAVHPNPuyjnjkVBnzWAF-tZ6FUeftteJaTuYkU2e5ptFXLA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAHzLAVHPNPuyjnjkVBnzWAF-tZ6FUeftteJaTuYkU2e5ptFXLA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 5:34 PM Rick Miller <vrwmiller@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > security/openssh-portable was recently updated to 8.0p1 and breaks GSSAPI. > I'd like to test the Debian GSSAPI patch for 8.0p1[1] submitting the result > to the openssh-portable maintainer. Poudriere already sets the appropriate > options for KERB_GSSAPI here so the intent is to leverage Poudriere. For > example, create a new poudriere ports tree (poudriere ports -c), update > security/openssh-portable/Makefile in that ports tree (patch below), > subsequently run `make makesum` to update distinfo, then build the tree > (poudriere bulk -f). > > I get to the point of running `make makesum` and distinfo is not updated > with the GSSAPI patch's patchfile's info (similar to the current distinfo) > and no error is printed. `make fetch` will retrieve openssh-portable > sources if they're not already present, but not the GSSAPI patchfile. Can > the patch be tested in place like this or am I going about this completely > wrong? > > > Defining OPTIONS_DEFAULT in the environment for make makesum got around this behavior. -- Take care Rick Miller
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHzLAVGgdLtTG4z3vQ5%2BgrE2y6iPRTPnZSn-SZi_k2A1vq-jaw>