From owner-freebsd-i18n@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 16 19:23:22 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-i18n@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: i18n@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F1B1065678;
	Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jh@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi
	[195.197.172.111])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781618FC12;
	Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:23:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from a91-153-117-195.elisa-laajakaista.fi
	(a91-153-117-195.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.153.117.195])
	by gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 57C6B2167FE;
	Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:04:16 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:04:16 +0300
From: Jaakko Heinonen <jh@FreeBSD.org>
To: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20100616190416.GA3896@a91-153-117-195.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
References: <4C16C5B5.1070308@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4C16C5B5.1070308@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Xin LI <d@delphij.net>,
	i18n@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system
X-BeenThere: freebsd-i18n@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD Internationalization Effort <freebsd-i18n.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-i18n>,
	<mailto:freebsd-i18n-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-i18n>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-i18n@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-i18n-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-i18n>,
	<mailto:freebsd-i18n-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:23:22 -0000


Hi,

On 2010-06-15, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> - The iconv.h header files is supposed to be compatible with the GNU 
> version, i.e. sources should build with base iconv.h and GNU libiconv. 
> I've just did a very quick test and it seems ports can safely link to 
> GNU libiconv, there's no conflict.

> The rather big patch (42,5M) is available here: 
> http://www.kovesdan.org/patches/iconv_base_integrate.diff

iconv(3) prototype doesn't conform to POSIX.1-2008. Is it a
well-considered decision?

-- 
Jaakko