Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:32:11 +0100 (CET) From: hm@kts.org (Hellmuth Michaelis) To: wilko@yedi.iaf.nl (Wilko Bulte) Cc: hm@hcs.de, freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: urgh?? Message-ID: <m10I80h-00002ZC@bert.kts.org> In-Reply-To: <199903021819.TAA00804@yedi.iaf.nl> from Wilko Bulte at "Mar 2, 1999 7:19:25 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Seriously: the Q.850 standard says "this cause indicates that the switching > > equipment generating this cause is experiencing a period of high traffic". > > > > Its in the responsibility of the ISDN provider (the Dutch PTT ?). > > Dutch PTT alright. What I don't get that I could call my one analog phone > with the other one (each on a different TA BTW) while i4b reported the > congestion thingy. Telephony uses another bearer capability than 64k data transmission and i am quite shure that telephony uses much less resources and is able to use a much less quality link. hellmuth -- Hellmuth Michaelis hm@kts.org Hamburg, Europe We all live in a yellow subroutine, yellow subroutine, yellow subroutine ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m10I80h-00002ZC>