From owner-freebsd-audit Thu Mar 23 11:36:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9638C37B57F for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 11:36:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA35050; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 12:36:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id MAA43081; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 12:36:32 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200003231936.MAA43081@harmony.village.org> To: "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" Subject: Re: Portmapper enabled, IPv6 circumvents FW Cc: FreeBSD Audit List In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Mar 2000 15:29:54 -0400." <38DA70B2.96AF6B6D@vangelderen.org> References: <38DA70B2.96AF6B6D@vangelderen.org> <38DA6D77.FB93FC36@vangelderen.org> <200003231923.MAA42847@harmony.village.org> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 12:36:32 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <38DA70B2.96AF6B6D@vangelderen.org> "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" writes: : But why not enable portmapper contingent on NFS being enabled? Not : possible? Yes, this is possible. : Interesting, would this include disabling sendmail by default? : (Please say yes.) ALL NETWORK SERVICES. All of them. sendmail, cron, inetd, lpd, portmapper and maybe a couple others. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message