Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 13:16:06 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Message-ID: <bug-239682-21738-5EF0iwiEkb@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-239682-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-239682-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |imp@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #24 from Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #23) when the llvm developers tell you it isn't ready, it isn't ready. When the graphics folks tell you it isn't ready, it isn't ready. If it's not ready, timing doesn't matter. Please start listening to your pe= ers. Bland assertions that we need to do this, or that a week is enough time are flat out wrong. This really needs to be backed out and you need to adopt a = more conservative approach to pushing things in. You are literally making a lot = of people very mad at you for not listening to them. There's a lot of smart pe= ople in the project, and when they are mad at you for how you've done something,= it pays to listen. They are almost certainly right. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-239682-21738-5EF0iwiEkb>