From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Oct 27 14:18:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from minuet.das.harvard.edu (minuet.das.harvard.edu [140.247.50.251]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D7737B479 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from endor.eas.harvard.edu (endor.harvard.edu [128.103.50.55]) by minuet.das.harvard.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA26395; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:18:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Dan Lanciani Received: (from ddl@localhost) by endor.eas.harvard.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA13943; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:18:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:18:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200010272118.RAA13943@endor.eas.harvard.edu> To: huntting@hunkular.glarp.com, jan@caustic.org Subject: Re: 6over4 for KAME (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, snap-users@kame.net Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG |i'm not sure if this is what you mean, but: | |http://www.kfu.com/~nsayer/6to4/ I think that might not be what he meant. :) However, speaking of 6to4, how accepting are the 6bone sites of 0x2002 prefix addresses? At first glance, www.6bone.net and www.kame.net are happy to respond to packets from 6to4 addresses, but some of the public IPv6 "tool" web sites don't have a route to any 6to4 relay at all (or at least that seems to be the case). IMHO, 6to4 is a great way to encourage IPv6 deployment (especially with Microsoft pushing it), but the addresses need to be treated as more than a temporary hack if people are to commit. (Alternately, I suppose 6to4 addresses could simply overtake "real" addresses. :) Dan Lanciani ddl@harvard.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message