From owner-freebsd-net Fri Dec 22 13:48: 3 2000 From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 22 13:48:01 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mail.integratus.com (unknown [63.209.2.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C47CF37B402 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 13:48:00 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 16882 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2000 21:47:50 -0000 Received: from kungfu.integratus.com (HELO integratus.com) (172.20.5.168) by tortuga1.integratus.com with SMTP; 22 Dec 2000 21:47:50 -0000 Sender: jar@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <3A43CC06.DD56C1BF@integratus.com> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 13:47:50 -0800 From: Jack Rusher Organization: http://www.integratus.com/ X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Smith Cc: Archie Cobbs , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Re: New netgraph features?] References: <20001222074211.20124.qmail@nw174.netaddress.usa.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org John Smith wrote: > > loose something, if we, say, create special node > for 'netgraph tunneling' (so that it may ot may not I would like to see netgraph used to facilitate shared coherent interface support for FreeBSD (very valuable for clustering). Does anyone have an opinion on the difficulty of hacking something like this into the tunnel node code? -- Jack Rusher, Senior Engineer | mailto:jar@integratus.com Integratus, Inc. | http://www.integratus.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message