From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 15 12:16:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC86037B401 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgw-x1.nokia.com (mgw-x1.nokia.com [131.228.20.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F3943FAF for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:16:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjj@isorauta.ntc.nokia.com) Received: from esvir05nok.ntc.nokia.com (esvir05nokt.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.37])h6FJGRa05297 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 22:16:27 +0300 (EET DST) Received: from esebh002.NOE.Nokia.com (unverified) by esvir05nok.ntc.nokia.com for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 22:16:26 +0300 Received: from isorauta.ntc.nokia.com ([172.22.105.162]) by esebh002.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6139); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 22:16:25 +0300 Received: (qmail 17111 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2003 19:16:25 -0000 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 22:16:25 +0300 From: Mike Jackson To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030715191625.GA17102@isorauta.ntc.nokia.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org References: <20030701063248.GA904@lewiz.org> <20030704233046.GB25099@speedy.unibe.ch> <20030713132011.GA9442@lewiz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030713132011.GA9442@lewiz.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jul 2003 19:16:25.0880 (UTC) FILETIME=[95ED9180:01C34B05] Subject: Re: Variable NFS mounts / firewall rules. X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 19:16:31 -0000 ext lewiz (purple@lewiz.info) wrote: > > You've probably already considered this, but I've just been playing with > amd for mounting the remote homedir, etc. This seems a pretty powerful > tool, and from what I understand the map files can be distributed > through a system like NIS (which would be superb for a fully automated > environment, such as you discuss), as well as being OS-independent (the > map files can use ${os}). NIS is old news and on the way out the door. You can store the AMD maps in LDAP nowadays. -- mike