From owner-freebsd-chat Mon May 4 08:13:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA15202 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Mon, 4 May 1998 08:13:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sasami.jurai.net (winter@sasami.jurai.net [207.153.65.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA15179 for ; Mon, 4 May 1998 08:13:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from winter@jurai.net) Received: from localhost (winter@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA07291; Mon, 4 May 1998 11:12:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 11:12:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" To: Don Wilde cc: Eivind Eklund , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/ijb - Imported sources In-Reply-To: <354DD2A7.76C69637@ibm.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 4 May 1998, Don Wilde wrote: > I do agree with Eivind's original argument that we shouldn't _advertise_ > the port as a blocking / cracking tool, though. The suits and the dark > glasses are all lots bigger than we are. Agree. IJB is no more or less evil than 'dd' or 'strobe'. While some may have issue with IJBs definition of 'junk' there is clearly a number of people that agree that its definition is correct. Lets label the port with what it does and move on. /* Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life winter@jurai.net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53 */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message