From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 30 17:55:00 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA28656 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 30 May 1995 17:55:00 -0700 Received: from physics.su.oz.au (dawes@physics.su.OZ.AU [129.78.129.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id RAA28623 for ; Tue, 30 May 1995 17:54:53 -0700 Received: by physics.su.oz.au id AA07042 (5.67b/IDA-1.4.4 for hackers@freebsd.org); Wed, 31 May 1995 10:54:22 +1000 From: David Dawes Message-Id: <199505310054.AA07042@physics.su.oz.au> Subject: Re: mailing lists To: jmb@kryten.atinc.com Date: Wed, 31 May 1995 10:54:17 +1000 (EST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Jonathan M. Bresler" at May 30, 95 07:57:50 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1562 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >On Wed, 31 May 1995, David Dawes wrote: > >> I've noticed for a while now that the mail I receive from hackers comes >> via munnari.oz.au rather than directly from freefall. When I looked >> into this, I found that mail I sent to myself from freefall (both to >> here and to a few other domains in .au) also came via munnari. I'd >> assumed that this was setup to allow all mailing list traffic to >> .au to go from one connection from freefall. Was this intentional? Do >> others in .au see this? We certainly don't have an MX pointing to that >> site. The down side of this from my point of view is that >> munnari.oz.au often has a long mail queue, and it isn't unusual for the > >strange the mail logs on freefall show: > >May 25 05:48:13 freefall sendmail[22630]: FAA22624: to=David Dawes >, delay=00:32:12, mailer=smtp, >relay=physics.su.oz.au. [129.78.129.1], stat=Sent (Ok) >May 25 17:40:36 freefall sendmail[24835]: RAA24788: >from=, size=627, class=0, pri=30627, nrcpts=1, >msgid=<199505260039.AA16549@physics.su.oz.au>, proto=SMTP, >relay=dawes@physics.su.OZ.AU [129.78.129.1] It looks like it is back to delivering directly. I must admit that I haven't checked this for a little while, but there was a long period where the mail was not coming directly. I've just looked back though some of the mail I've kept from this list, and it looks like it stopped using the indirect route after 8 April. It had been using the indirect route for at least a few months prior to that. David