From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Apr 20  7:32:14 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from pcnet1.pcnet.com (pcnet1.pcnet.com [204.213.232.3])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3059B14BEF
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 07:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: (from eischen@localhost)
	by pcnet1.pcnet.com (8.8.7/PCNet) id KAA06752;
	Tue, 20 Apr 1999 10:28:37 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 10:28:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
Message-Id: <199904201428.KAA06752@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
To: crossd@cs.rpi.edu, dick@tar.com
Subject: Re: -lpthread
Cc: dan@trinsec.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> I know this is a kludge, but it appears that a simple symlink from libc_r.*
> to libpthread.* would accomplish this.  My only goal is to make us 
> "more standard".

Yeah, but you can't just link with -lc_r (or -lpthread) and expect
everything to work.  The reason -pthread switch was added as a
gcc option, was to inhibit linking against libc and to only link
against libc_r.  Adding a link for -lpthread seems like a bad
idea.

Dan Eischen
eischen@vigrid.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message