From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 18 11:54:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47AF2D2E; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 11:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uqs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:23c2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5798FC12; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 11:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:23c2::1]) by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAIBsGvn078562 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:54:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from uqs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:54:15 +0100 From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= To: Jilles Tjoelker Subject: Re: svn commit: r242767 - in head/tools/regression/bin/sh: builtins parser Message-ID: <20121118115413.GB28199@acme.spoerlein.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= , Jilles Tjoelker , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org References: <201211081336.qA8DaJ1D081507@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201211081336.qA8DaJ1D081507@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 11:54:18 -0000 On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 13:36:19 +0000, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > Author: jilles > Date: Thu Nov 8 13:36:19 2012 > New Revision: 242767 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/242767 > > Log: > sh: Add tests for modifying an alias (r242766). > > Note: parser/alias10.0 will eat a lot of memory/cpu time when it fails (with > the old sh). Can't you run it with reduced ulimits to have it fail fast? Cheers, Uli