From owner-freebsd-security Fri Aug 28 15:46:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA04258 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 15:46:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from server.computeralt.com (server.computeralt.com [207.41.29.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA04225 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 15:46:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scott@computeralt.com) Received: from scott (scott.computeralt.com [207.41.29.100]) by server.computeralt.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id SAA08761 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 18:45:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199808282245.SAA08761@server.computeralt.com> X-Sender: scott@mail.computeralt.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1.0.49 (Beta) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 18:45:40 -0400 To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Scott I. Remick" Subject: What might use these ports? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org For the sake of something else to discuss... :) Is there anything legit that might use the following ports? 513, 514, 111 513 is listed in /etc/services as used by "remote login a la telnet" as well as whod. It says 514 is used by the shell. 111 is.... sunrpc 111/tcp rpcbind #SUN Remote Procedure Call So are 513 and 514 for real? How are they legitamately used? And what (in a normal install) might use 111??? Thanks a bunch. ----------------------- Scott I. Remick mailto:scott@computeralt.com Network and Information Systems (802)388-7545 FAX:(802)388-3697 Computer Alternatives, Inc. http://www.computeralt.com Theater is life. Television is furniture. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message