From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 13:59:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D111106564A; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 13:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [IPv6:2a01:170:102f::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDB58FC17; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 13:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA9DxIuw079253; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:59:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oA9DxI3U079252; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:59:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:59:18 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <201011091359.oA9DxI3U079252@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, ivoras@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-fs User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/6.4-PRERELEASE-20080904 (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.5 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:59:34 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: problem mounting from flash [Invalid sectorsize] [g_vfs_done() ?error=22] X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, ivoras@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:59:35 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > What might or might not work well, I think, is having fragment/block > ratio other then "8". I've also successfully used fsize == bsize (i.e. ratio 1). But I also think that ratios other than 1 and 8 will not work well. Another question is whether other FS-related tools like fsck(8) and dump(8) work well with unusual file systems. Having FFS support for, say, 65536 byte sectors won't buy you much if fsck can't reliably handle it. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution." -- Robert Sewell