From owner-freebsd-net  Fri Sep  1 12:55: 5 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mailserver.KOM.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de (drum.kom.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.139.190])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C10D37B42C
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  1 Sep 2000 12:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from KOM.tu-darmstadt.de by mailserver.KOM.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de (8.7.5/8.7.5) with ESMTP id VAA24721; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 21:55:00 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Martin Karsten <Martin.Karsten@KOM.tu-darmstadt.de>
Received: from KOM.tu-darmstadt.de by KOM.tu-darmstadt.de (8.9.3/8.7.5) id VAA07262; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 21:54:58 +0200
Message-Id: <200009011954.VAA07262@KOM.tu-darmstadt.de>
Subject: Re: kern/20984: conflict between IP_RSVP_ON and IP_RSVP_VIF_ON
To: kjc@csl.sony.co.jp
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 21:54:58 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Kenjiro,

following your advice, I have submitted my request as the subjected bug
report with send-pr. I have tested the change with ISI's rsvpd once again
and as described in the bug report, the proposed small change does not
affect the (however unsatisfying) behaviour of rsvpd.

I have reported this behaviour as well as the proposed fix to the rsvp-test
list at isi.edu about one year ago, but I have never really received any
answer.

Thanks and best regards,
Martin

PS: please include my email address in any further discussion, since I am
not subscribed to freebsd-net

----- Forwarded message from gnats-admin@FreeBSD.org -----