Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 09:01:24 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: One True Awk licensing Message-ID: <200111051701.fA5H1OU09029@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com> In-Reply-To: <20011105124550.N83053@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: <200111050201.fA5210404370@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com> <20011105124550.N83053@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_-1962897152P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > -On [20011105 03:30], Bruce A. Mah (bmah@freebsd.org) wrote: > >bwk wanted us to let him know if we decide to use it, because he has a > >few minor code fixes (no feature changes) he'd like us to take too. > > > >(This all happened before we ran into the problem with needing POSIX.1 > >character class support, and DES's subsequent patch to incorporate this > >feature.) > > So we can become/are becoming/are willing to become the bwk maintainers? > Personally it would be cool to do so. Ummm...if you're suggesting that the FreeBSD developers would become the "official" maintainers of 1TAwk, no, neither bwk nor I were suggesting any such thing. All I meant was that bwk had some patches that he'd made to 1TAwk that weren't in the sharball on Web page, and that he'd pass them to us. Bruce. --==_Exmh_-1962897152P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1+ 05/14/2001 iD4DBQE75sXk2MoxcVugUsMRAhWUAKD17atvuoSDkzOimHAoytLzuvz1vgCYgwLz oSBSLYALThbdW/vBmK0SjQ== =t4ps -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1962897152P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111051701.fA5H1OU09029>