From owner-freebsd-hubs Wed May 2 22:24:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from peter3.wemm.org (c1315225-a.plstn1.sfba.home.com [65.0.135.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D4037B422 for ; Wed, 2 May 2001 22:24:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by peter3.wemm.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f435OIM96784 for ; Wed, 2 May 2001 22:24:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF81E380A for ; Wed, 2 May 2001 22:24:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ftp-master method In-Reply-To: <20010503051020.7BDCB380A@overcee.netplex.com.au> Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 22:24:18 -0700 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20010503052418.CF81E380A@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Peter Wemm wrote: > Will Andrews wrote: > > > OK, so people have problems with either mirror/spegla+ftp and rsync. > > How about cvsup? It uses the rsync algorithm with some optimizations, > > and can be configured to have a maximum number of deletions, and has > > several methods of excluding files. It also requires little memory, > > although it does hurt when it comes to cpu. And I'll bet it's a bit > > faster than rsync, to put it mildly. > > I think we're just about ready to go, at least for the rsync clients. Some things I forgot to mention.. I'm using the same access list that ftp.freesoftware.com had for the mirror class. If you were mirroring anonymously, you will need to get in touch. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message