Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 00:32:30 -0000 From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: scottl@FreeBSD.org Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, tinderbox@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Message-ID: <20050131.000115.04191271.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org> References: <20050130130011.A9B0D7306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org>
Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: Why on earth is the digi driver bein compiled on sparc64?
Most likely historical inertia... No body noticed until that module
build got more facist.
Warner
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050131.000115.04191271.imp>