From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 21 05:04:32 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB23316A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 05:04:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pacha.mail.bishopston.net (pacha.mail.bishopston.net
	[66.221.209.133])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5A543D46
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 05:04:32 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jamie@bishopston.net)
X-Catflap-Envelope-From: <jamie@catflap.bishopston.net>
X-Catflap-Envelope-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from catflap.bishopston.net (jamie@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by catflap.bishopston.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9L54T9T020928
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Thu, 21 Oct 2004 06:04:29 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from jamie@catflap.bishopston.net)
Received: (from jamie@localhost)
	by catflap.bishopston.net (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) id i9L54RhY020926;
	Thu, 21 Oct 2004 06:04:27 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 06:04:27 +0100 (BST)
From: Jamie Jones <jamie@bishopston.net>
Message-Id: <200410210504.i9L54RhY020926@catflap.bishopston.net>
To: ofsen@enderunix.org
X-Scanned-By: milter-sender/0.58.805 (localhost [127.0.0.1]);
	Thu, 21 Oct 2004 06:04:29 +0100
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ipfw bw limiting question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 05:04:33 -0000


> What I didn't understand is why I am stating src-ip 0xfffffff as the mask. I
> mean in my bw limiting rules destionation ips (IP1, IP2 ...) should be the
> one that create dynamic pipes whose bw is 100kbits/s for each pipe. But I
> give src-ip 0xfffffff. Shouldn't the right way for that is to use dst-ip
> 0xffffff here?

To me, dst-ip seems logical - I assume you are saying it doesn't work ?

Weird...

Anyway, try replacing "src-ip 0xffffffff" with simply the word "all".
Does that do the trick?

cheers, Jamie