From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 23 14:40:37 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124916A9
 for <freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:40:37 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from mail-ie0-f170.google.com (mail-ie0-f170.google.com
 [209.85.223.170])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D261324BD
 for <freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:40:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id at1so1477429iec.15
 for <freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from
 :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references
 :to; bh=4og7KLUpscb9WxuVwpbzyEkIHC8QYBH98/Y+W/O+vSs=;
 b=UdhC7iKRX5YtYiUnLU8ROz4myVdq9mCjNZw5BbgdBAC6oHUEN1Cx5Nb/ios6kFpVwx
 SVI9l4xw9TS02EC7F436Y/R8LRdT0UKRAe3pEWh3MaB+NnMY9oBO+VbdZwbRh9Dqs3HE
 7gBsLBOIQBGBsUEX9auHhMq42qUazPWsc3aSClbzuEOtNSl/UXDT+zZZk39bkGrovpML
 tgwih9MC2aXxYMT5BpIB88iXFSJ9NVDaTGDRbZcOMP08VOQgXtL3JvZShsccHl8O1hDa
 GwpDMmW42RngXq4ycm7vqZDZfgheEMnQrOj2tecfeqeRHkpmx5/ey1RB1gMgc08IMRqQ
 RCgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkLFACrYzQA1vmmyLnOPLbHM5UdA5wMQX0B9p3QIkJdHg6bdIn0NGcpvORaHuUHTGn3ohj9
X-Received: by 10.50.6.99 with SMTP id z3mr999922igz.27.1382539230143;
 Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 53.imp.bsdimp.com
 (50-78-194-198-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.78.194.198])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q6sm8026155igi.0.2013.10.23.07.40.28
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Warner Losh <wlosh@bsdimp.com>
Subject: Re: VLC 2.1.0
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131023121237.51e5a79e@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:40:27 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <55D30F7E-4F38-472C-8143-53200D55DFBA@bsdimp.com>
References: <CAHtVNLONK3hZTUoJoebjtdZbhwK8pA8deO1um191zF5pZowF9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20131022152502.61214646@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
 <CAHtVNLOp+Xqj+EbVsxDsLj4tjsxJkjWLm9G0ze_ND_noYGu_=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20131022174715.59433270@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
 <20131022212327.GB20055@stack.nl>
 <20131023121237.51e5a79e@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: multimedia-list freebsd <freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org>,
 William Grzybowski <william88@gmail.com>, freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org,
 Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Standards compliance <freebsd-standards.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-standards>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:40:37 -0000


On Oct 23, 2013, at 4:12 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:

> <pthread_cleanup.patch>

I think this patch is way too complex. We just need a real statement =
before the } in the unorthodox push/pop macros to make them =
syntactically a statement in all contexts...  (void)0; does that, as =
does do { ...} while(0); In the cases where it would matter the =
difference between {} and do { } while(0); can't happen with this macro =
because it can't be used in the context of an if statement without {}...

Warner